Is Cisco’s LoRaWAN Exit a Cause for Concern?
Cisco’s decision to scale back its LoRaWAN efforts has sparked concern amongst the IoT community. With the tech giant shifting focus towards other technologies, many are wondering if this signals the end of LoRaWAN’s relevance in the ever-evolving IoT landscape.
But does Cisco’s move mean it’s time to panic? And what alternatives are available for those relying on LoRaWAN?
LoRaWAN has always been an open, versatile network standard for IoT applications requiring long-range, low-power communications. Cisco’s involvement in this technology provided a certain level of credibility, helping push LoRaWAN into wider adoption. However, Cisco’s decision to reduce its role doesn’t equate to a death sentence for the technology.
LoRaWAN remains critical for many applications that benefit from its long-range, low-power consumption and its capability to function in unlicensed spectrum bands. Major players like Semtech (the company behind LoRa technology), Actility, and The Things Industries continue to innovate and support the ecosystem. In sectors like agriculture, logistics, and smart cities, LoRaWAN has proven to be highly effective.
Why Did Cisco Pull Back?
Cisco’s strategic retreat likely stems from a desire to focus on its more lucrative and broader-reaching IoT technologies, such as NB-IoT and 5G. These technologies are better suited for high-bandwidth, real-time applications—markets where Cisco’s expertise in large-scale networking is more directly applicable.
LoRaWAN, in contrast, is more niche, optimised for low-bandwidth use cases that don’t require Cisco’s typical heavy-duty networking infrastructure. In short, while LoRaWAN is great for tracking a herd of cattle or managing a smart irrigation system, Cisco’s core strengths lie elsewhere.
LoRaWAN’s Resilience
While Cisco’s exit might feel like a blow, LoRaWAN isn’t going anywhere. The technology has a strong, established ecosystem driven by other leading players. Organisations like the LoRa Alliance, which includes hundreds of members working on expanding LoRaWAN’s potential, ensure the protocol’s ongoing development and support.
The open nature of LoRaWAN means it isn’t tethered to any one company. Developers and businesses continue to use LoRaWAN networks through equipment from other vendors like Kerlink, MultiTech, and Laird Connectivity. Moreover, many service providers still offer LoRaWAN as a service, ensuring that connectivity remains accessible even if Cisco isn’t directly involved.
Exploring the Alternatives: CAT-M1, NB-IoT and 5G
While LoRaWAN remains an excellent choice for certain applications, Cisco’s shift towards other technologies opens the door for businesses to consider alternatives, especially for use cases that require higher bandwidth or real-time capabilities.
NB-IoT (Narrowband IoT) is one such alternative. It operates in licensed spectrum, offering more reliable connections in challenging environments and better integration with cellular networks. For applications needing higher data rates, more robust security, and low latency, NB-IoT is a strong contender.
5G is also emerging as a key player in IoT, especially in applications that demand low-latency, high-speed data transfers like autonomous vehicles or smart manufacturing. Though overkill for low-data-rate use cases, 5G is expected to dominate in high-performance IoT scenarios.
What Should Businesses Do?
If you’re using LoRaWAN today, there’s no reason to jump ship just because Cisco is pulling out. Evaluate your specific use case: LoRaWAN still excels in areas that need low power, long range, and minimal bandwidth. However, if your applications are evolving to require real-time connectivity or operate in complex environments with higher data needs, it might be worth exploring CAT-M1, NB-IoT or 5G.
For most, a hybrid approach could be the best option. Different IoT solutions will coexist, and the key is understanding which technology best suits your current and future needs.
